genetically engineered approval

 

Last week, federal health officials announced plans for an approval process of genetically engineered (GE) animals used for food.  However, consumer groups say the plan is not enough to ensure the safety of the consumer, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Genetic engineering, already widely used for crops, is on the threshold of producing animals that can grow faster or even yield drugs that treat human illnesses. Although the potential benefits — and profits — are huge, many individuals have qualms about manipulating the genetic code of other living creatures.

The FDA has stated that it will not allow for the approval of GE animals without severe scrutiny.  But, many criticize the policy because, approving an GE animal, does not mean it will be labeled as such.  In other words, because of lack of labeling consumers, without knowing about or wanting to, may be ingesting GE animals.

There is also criticism that the evaluation of the animals does not include what might happen to the environment.  Of particular concern, is the possibility of am animal escaping and mating with a non-GE animal.

And, while many talk about the eating of GE animals, there is also debate from drugs made from GE animals.  Last week, a product made from the milk of a GE goat was before the FDA for approval.  At this point, it was deemed safe and effective for human use.  But, is it?

Many are urging the upcoming Obama administration to reconsider the current FDA policy on genetically engineered animals.  Although, the biotechnology industry welcomed the announcement from the FDA, and as we all know, the lobbying power of that group is strong in D.C.