Election Round-Up

I ended up not posting last night, because Obama’s win became too thrilling and non-environmental propositions became too heartbreaking.

But here is the final tally of the ballot measures across the country:

California:
Proposition 1A: Approved, 52.3%
Proposition 2: Approved, 63.3%
Proposition 7: Defeated, 65%
Proposition 10: Defeated, 59.9%

Colorado:
Amendment 58: Defeated, 58% (so many 58′s… too funny)

Georgia:
Amendment 1: Approved, 68%

Maine:
Question 3: too close to call

Minnesota:
HF 2285: Approved, 56%

Missouri:
Proposition C: Approved, 66%

Ohio:
Issue 2: Approved, 69%

Rhode Island:
Question 1: Approved, 76%
Question 2: Approved, 68%

Maine Bonds for Water Project, Question 3

Bonds for Water Project:

“Do you favor a $3.4 million bond issue to support drinking water programs, to support the construction of wastewater treatment facilities and to leverage $17 million in other funds?”

If passed, the measure would:

* Fund the state’s revolving loan fund that communities can apply to for low-interest loans.
* Stipulate that every $1 of state money raised will attract $5 in federal money, according to the Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Argument FOR:
- The $40.5 million the state has spent since 1988 from the clean water and drinking water revolving funds have leveraged $201 million in federal funds

This is interesting in that this question, so far, has no organized opposition.

My recommendation: YES

It is so hard to judge some of these out of state ballot issues. I am interpreting the supporting argument to mean that everyone feels there is a strong return on investment for the financial output. There seems to be no opposition since the other ballot measures are garnering most of the attention. The governor, a senator and a congressperson support this measure.

There are no websites for either side.